1966 Abarth OT vs. 2008 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2008 Fiat Croma is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Croma weights approximately 700 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2008 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Abarth | Fiat |
Model | OT | Croma |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 146 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 62 L |