1966 Abarth OT vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 1695 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | OT | Livina |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 52 L |