1966 Abarth OT vs. 2009 BMW M3
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1966 Abarth OT. (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2009 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Abarth | BMW |
| Model | OT | M3 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 414 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 8300 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 12.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 249 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 63 L |
