1966 Abarth OT vs. 2009 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2009 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 825 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2009 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | OT | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 5999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 332 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 98 L |
