1966 Abarth OT vs. 2009 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,562 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1150 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 2009 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2009 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | OT | SRX |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3562 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 254 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 76 L |