1966 Abarth OT vs. 2009 Kia Optima
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth OT (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2009 Kia Optima. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Optima.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2009 Kia Optima | |
Make | Abarth | Kia |
Model | OT | Optima |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 62 L |