1966 Abarth OT vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,630 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1907 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Abarth | Land Rover |
Model | OT | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3630 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 2717 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 105 L |