1966 Abarth OT vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | OT | 5 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 60 L |