1966 Abarth OT vs. 2009 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2009 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota 4Runner (233 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1966 Abarth OT. (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1966 Abarth OT has manual transmission. 1966 Abarth OT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2009 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | OT | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 233 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 50 L |
