1966 Abarth OT vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 4,414 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 792 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 2009 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Abarth | Volvo |
| Model | OT | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 4414 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 311 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1602 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 80 L |
