1966 Abarth OT vs. 2010 Renault Thalia
To start off, 2010 Renault Thalia is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth OT (185 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2010 Renault Thalia. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Thalia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Thalia weights approximately 290 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Thalia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2010 Renault Thalia | |
| Make | Abarth | Renault |
| Model | OT | Thalia |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 104 HP |
| Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4261 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1639 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1439 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2473 mm |
