1966 Abarth OT vs. 2010 SsangYong Actyon
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Actyon is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Actyon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SsangYong Actyon weights approximately 966 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 2010 SsangYong Actyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Actyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2010 SsangYong Actyon | |
| Make | Abarth | SsangYong |
| Model | OT | Actyon |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1776 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 75 L |
