1966 Abarth OT vs. 2010 SsangYong Actyon
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Actyon is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Actyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth OT (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2010 SsangYong Actyon. (139 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2010 SsangYong Actyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SsangYong Actyon weights approximately 1062 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 2010 SsangYong Actyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Actyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2010 SsangYong Actyon | |
Make | Abarth | SsangYong |
Model | OT | Actyon |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 86.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 85.6 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1772 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 75 L |