1966 Abarth OT vs. 2010 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2010 Subaru Forester is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Subaru Forester weights approximately 740 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 2010 Subaru Forester is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2010 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Abarth | Subaru |
| Model | OT | Forester |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4559 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1674 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2616 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 64 L |
