1966 Abarth OT vs. 2010 Volkswagen Jetta
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Jetta is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volkswagen Jetta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Jetta (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1966 Abarth OT. (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Jetta should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Jetta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2010 Volkswagen Jetta | |
Make | Abarth | Volkswagen |
Model | OT | Jetta |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1458 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 55 L |