1966 Abarth OT vs. 2010 Volkswagen Routan
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Routan is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volkswagen Routan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Routan weights approximately 1234 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Routan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2010 Volkswagen Routan | |
Make | Abarth | Volkswagen |
Model | OT | Routan |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 2044 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5144 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1953 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3078 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 78 L |