1966 Abarth OT vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 987 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | OT | CHARGER |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 288 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3052 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 72 L |