1966 Abarth OT vs. 2013 Ford EDGE
To start off, 2013 Ford EDGE is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford EDGE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford EDGE weights approximately 1030 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2013 Ford EDGE | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | OT | EDGE |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4679 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2223 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1702 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2824 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |
