1966 Abarth OT vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1130 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | OT | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4684 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1798 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 85 L |