1966 Abarth OT vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Kia RIO weights approximately 369 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Abarth | Kia |
Model | OT | RIO |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 136 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1179 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 43 L |