1966 Abarth OT vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1117 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2013 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | OT | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 269 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1927 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 76 L |