1966 AC Cobra vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1966 AC Cobra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 AC Cobra (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 978 kg more than 1966 AC Cobra.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1966 AC Cobra has manual transmission. 1966 AC Cobra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 AC Cobra | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Cobra | 62 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 6382 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1147 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 79 L |