1966 AC Cobra vs. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1966 AC Cobra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 AC Cobra (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 AC Cobra weights approximately 7 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 AC Cobra | 1964 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | AC | Sunbeam |
Model | Cobra | Tiger |
Year Released | 1966 | 1964 |
Body Type | Roadster | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1147 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2190 mm |