1966 AC Cobra vs. 1978 Mazda 929
To start off, 1978 Mazda 929 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 AC Cobra (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 327 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 AC Cobra weights approximately 77 kg more than 1978 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 AC Cobra (651 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 517 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1966 AC Cobra | 1978 Mazda 929 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Cobra | 929 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 651 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 107.7 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1147 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |