1966 AC Cobra vs. 1979 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1979 Lancia Beta is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 AC Cobra weights approximately 87 kg more than 1979 Lancia Beta.
Because 1966 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Lancia Beta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 AC Cobra | 1979 Lancia Beta | |
Make | AC | Lancia |
Model | Cobra | Beta |
Year Released | 1966 | 1979 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1147 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 51 L |