1966 AC Cobra vs. 1988 Renault Megane
To start off, 1988 Renault Megane is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 AC Cobra (410 HP) has 160 more horse power than 1988 Renault Megane. (250 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1988 Renault Megane.
Because 1966 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 AC Cobra (651 Nm) has 470 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Renault Megane. (181 Nm). This means 1966 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 AC Cobra | 1988 Renault Megane | |
| Make | AC | Renault |
| Model | Cobra | Megane |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1988 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6997 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 410 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 651 Nm | 181 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
