1966 AC Cobra vs. 1990 Audi 200
To start off, 1990 Audi 200 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 AC Cobra (410 HP) has 260 more horse power than 1990 Audi 200. (150 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1990 Audi 200.
Because 1990 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 AC Cobra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 AC Cobra (651 Nm) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Audi 200. (210 Nm). This means 1966 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 AC Cobra | 1990 Audi 200 | |
| Make | AC | Audi |
| Model | Cobra | 200 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6997 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 410 HP | 150 HP |
| Torque | 651 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Top Speed | 266 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2660 mm |
