1966 AC Cobra vs. 1995 BMW S3
To start off, 1995 BMW S3 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 AC Cobra (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1995 BMW S3. (338 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW S3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 BMW S3 weights approximately 578 kg more than 1966 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 AC Cobra (651 Nm) has 391 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW S3. (260 Nm). This means 1966 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW S3.
Compare all specifications:
1966 AC Cobra | 1995 BMW S3 | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Cobra | S3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 338 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 651 Nm | 260 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1147 kg | 1725 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2770 mm |