1966 AC Cobra vs. 1995 Tata E
To start off, 1995 Tata E is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 AC Cobra (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1995 Tata E. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1995 Tata E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Tata E weights approximately 223 kg more than 1966 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 AC Cobra (651 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Tata E. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Tata E.
Compare all specifications:
1966 AC Cobra | 1995 Tata E | |
Make | AC | Tata |
Model | Cobra | E |
Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 651 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1147 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2810 mm |