1966 AC Cobra vs. 1999 Nissan SUT
To start off, 1999 Nissan SUT is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 AC Cobra (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 1999 Nissan SUT. (140 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan SUT.
Because 1999 Nissan SUT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 AC Cobra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan SUT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 AC Cobra (651 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan SUT. (372 Nm). This means 1966 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan SUT. 1999 Nissan SUT has automatic transmission and 1966 AC Cobra has manual transmission. 1966 AC Cobra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan SUT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 AC Cobra | 1999 Nissan SUT | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Cobra | SUT |
Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 3299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 651 Nm | 372 Nm |
Top Speed | 266 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |