1966 AC Cobra vs. 1999 Nissan XVL

To start off, 1999 Nissan XVL is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 AC Cobra (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 1999 Nissan XVL. (156 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan XVL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan XVL weights approximately 113 kg more than 1966 AC Cobra.

Because 1966 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan XVL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 AC Cobra (651 Nm) has 341 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan XVL. (310 Nm). This means 1966 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan XVL. 1999 Nissan XVL has automatic transmission and 1966 AC Cobra has manual transmission. 1966 AC Cobra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan XVL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: