1966 AC Cobra vs. 1999 Toyota Coaster
To start off, 1999 Toyota Coaster is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Toyota Coaster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 AC Cobra | 1999 Toyota Coaster | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | Cobra | Coaster |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Size | 6997 cc | 3430 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 410 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 266 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 20 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
