1966 AC Cobra vs. 2000 Chevrolet Triax
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 451 kg more than 1966 AC Cobra.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 AC Cobra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 1966 AC Cobra has manual transmission. 1966 AC Cobra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 AC Cobra | 2000 Chevrolet Triax | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Cobra | Triax |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 660 cc |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1147 kg | 1598 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2790 mm |