1966 AC Cobra vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1966 AC Cobra. (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1966 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 AC Cobra (651 Nm) has 473 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1966 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
1966 AC Cobra | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Cobra | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 651 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2580 mm |