1966 AC Cobra vs. 2005 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2005 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 AC Cobra (651 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 03-Sep. (350 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1966 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 03-Sep.
Compare all specifications:
1966 AC Cobra | 2005 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | AC | Saab |
Model | Cobra | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 2800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 651 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 107.7 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 74.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |