1966 AC Cobra vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 AC Cobra (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (197 HP @ 7250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio.
Because 1966 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 AC Cobra (651 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 359 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM). This means 1966 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1966 AC Cobra | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | AC | Renault |
Model | Cobra | Clio |
Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 651 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 107.7 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 266 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |