1966 AC Cobra vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 565 kg more than 1966 AC Cobra.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 AC Cobra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 AC Cobra (651 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 459 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1966 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 AC Cobra | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | Cobra | Condor |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6997 cc | 2986 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 410 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 651 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 107.7 mm | 99.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 22.2:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1147 kg | 1712 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |
