1966 AC Cobra vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 AC Cobra (410 HP) has 249 more horse power than 2009 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 AC Cobra (651 Nm) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Colorado. (360 Nm). This means 1966 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
1966 AC Cobra | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
Make | AC | Holden |
Model | Cobra | Colorado |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 651 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |