1966 AC Cobra vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 AC Cobra (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 2009 Volvo C70. (224 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo C70.
Because 1966 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 AC Cobra (651 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 415 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo C70. (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1966 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
1966 AC Cobra | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | AC | Volvo |
Model | Cobra | C70 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6997 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 410 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 651 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 266 km/hour | 239 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1840 mm |