1966 AC Cobra vs. 2012 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2012 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 AC Cobra (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 2012 Saab 03-Sep. (180 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2012 Saab 03-Sep.
Because 2012 Saab 03-Sep is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 AC Cobra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Saab 03-Sep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 AC Cobra (651 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Saab 03-Sep. (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1966 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Saab 03-Sep.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 AC Cobra | 2012 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | AC | Saab |
| Model | Cobra | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6997 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 410 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 651 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 107.7 mm | 90.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 82 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 266 km/hour | 225 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 58 L |
