1966 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2003 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2003 GMC Sierra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 4,816 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 GMC Sierra (275 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 GMC Sierra weights approximately 575 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 GMC Sierra (386 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600. (220 Nm). This means 2003 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2003 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | GMC |
Model | 2600 | Sierra |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2583 cc | 4816 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 275 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 386 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3380 mm |