1966 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600 (163 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2012 Holden Cruze. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Because 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600 (220 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 1966 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 2600 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 176 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2685 mm |