1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 1946 Lancia Ardea 3
To start off, 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 1,570 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia weights approximately 328 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Lancia |
| Model | Giulia | Ardea 3 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1570 cc | 903 cc |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 28 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 6.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1002 kg | 674 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 29 L |
