1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 552 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 1997 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | Giulia | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1570 cc | 5665 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 468 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 99.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 91.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.1:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1524 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2690 mm |
