1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2000 Lada Niva
To start off, 2000 Lada Niva is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,690 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Lada Niva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia (105 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2000 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lada Niva weights approximately 238 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 133 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2000 Lada Niva | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lada |
Model | Giulia | Niva |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 42 L |