1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo
To start off, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 1,570 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo has automatic transmission and 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia has manual transmission. 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Pininfarina |
Model | Giulia | Metrocubo |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 505 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |