1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia (163 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | Giulia | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2490 mm |