1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (105 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 328 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | Giulia | Tracker |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 61 L |