1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (105 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 808 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | Giulia | Tundra |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 3376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 100 L |