1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ferrari California weights approximately 707 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ferrari California (504 Nm) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (142 Nm). This means 2013 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2013 Ferrari California | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ferrari |
| Model | Giulia | California |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 504 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 77 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1002 kg | 1709 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4562 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1308 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 78 L |
